MP STYLE GUIDE RSSBritney Spears is the spokesperson for Candies and the latest unretouched campaign shots have been exposed! The shots have been released alongside the digitally enhanced ones. In the digitally enhanced ones her tattoo is gone, she is smoothed out, and slimmed down.
What do you think of the before and after?
I personally think its not overly done like some pictures we have seen …
Yes, they removed the shadow from her armpit. Evened out her skin tone (which lighten the legs) and removed a bruise it looks like. And “smoothed” out her cellulite.
What I dont agree with is slimming her thigh muscles (she’s athletic) and making her torso smaller to be more “pleasing”
She looks so much better in the unretouched photos. She has no curves in the digitally enhanced ones.
I had no idea she has such an athletic body. I only see pictures of her, and they are always photoshopped to make her look petite. Her unretouched legs rock!
Agree! Love Britney’s shape!
Like her body in the original photos better. I can understand smoothing out her cellulite (btw, which is not bad at all) & complexion but they should have left her real size & muscle tone! Go Britney!
I wrote about this very subject today. I can understand covering bruises or blemishes, but I’m a fan of the curves. She’s got fantastic legs. Why take away their great shape? Makes no sense to me.
Wow, this gives due credit to all the amazing ladies out there that actually do look like the retouched version of britney – Hence the reason why i would never hook up with her
Being Photographer (retired). it’s a well done Photo-shop. Want until you have to shoot somone LOTs older (Maryann of Sit and Be Fit). But I don’t understand making the legs look smaller. Nothing wrong with them before.
She’s amazingly hot Before and After. Before looks fine to me.